“I have never seen a railway before,” a
woman named Joannie tells the gathering,
according to minutes of the meeting. “Could
you give a better idea of what the train
will look like?”
Nobody else has seen a railway on Baffin
Island either. No one has built one this far
north, anywhere. But now – thanks to an
insatiable global demand for minerals, and
climate change that has opened up northern
shipping routes – a rail line across part of
Baffin Island is about to become a reality.
It’s
also a sign of things to come. Places like
Baffin Island have always held a treasure
trove of minerals, but low commodity prices,
coupled with the high cost of operating in
the Arctic, left many deposits undeveloped.
With prices for nearly every mineral now
soaring, however, mining’s last frontier has
become financially viable. And with
temperatures climbing because of global
warming, mining in the Arctic has become
logistically possible as well, because sea
lanes stay open longer due to thinner ice
and railways can operate year round.
In the past year, two iron ore mines in
Norway’s far north have been re-opened after
being abandoned for 14 years and there are
plans to open an iron ore mine in northern
Sweden. Greenland has been overrun with
dozens of mining companies eager to dig into
rich deposits of uranium, zinc and rare
earth minerals that have been uncovered by
melting ice caps. Russian cargo ships have
started plying the icy Arctic waters
carrying tonnes of minerals from mines in
Siberia to Rotterdam.
The people in Kimmirut and several other
communities across Nunavut are already
getting an idea of what’s about to happen in
Canada. For months, they’ve been poring over
plans for a giant iron ore mine at Mary
River, on the northern reaches of Baffin
Island and roughly 1,000 kilometres
northwest of Iqaluit. It is easily among the
most ambitious mining ventures ever
undertaken in the Arctic, and an
illustration of the lengths to which
companies are going to find the resources to
build the world’s emerging economies.
The mine itself will be an open-pit
operation spanning more than two kilometres
across the top of a small mountain. There
will also be a townsite with an airstrip
capable of handling commercial jets, and a
deepwater sea port fit for 10 ice-breaking
cargo ships roughly 15 times larger than any
vessel currently sailing the eastern Arctic.
Linking
everything together will be a 149-kilometre
railway that is designed to carry trains
stretching more than one kilometre in length
from the mine site to the port. The mine,
the trains and the ships are intended to
operate every day for 21 years and move 18
million tonnes of iron ore annually to ships
that will take the metal to blast furnaces
in steel mills across Europe.
The impact on Nunavut will be profound. The
mine is expected to triple the territory’s
annual gross domestic product growth rate
and provide nearly $5-billion in tax revenue
and royalties to the territory over the life
of the project. It will create more than
5,000 direct jobs, many more indirect
positions and offer training opportunities
in an area of the country where four out of
every six people live in social housing and
life expectancy is 10 years lower than the
rest of Canada.
But there will also be consequences. The
mine will leave untold scars on the natural
landscape and cut into the fragile
permafrost. It will affect caribou
migration, disturb walrus populations and
have an impact on seals, polar bears, beluga
whales, foxes, ermines, lemmings, hares and
narwhals. It is an age-old tension – jobs
and economic development versus the
environmental costs – but one that is about
to be felt in new ways in northern
communities around the world, and
particularly in Canada.
Mining in the north isn’t new; there are
other projects in Nunavut. But it has never
been attempted on this scale before. Iron
ore is all about volume, and by that
measure, no other mining project in Canada’s
North comes close to Mary River. The nearest
comparison is the Raglan nickel mine in
Northern Quebec, a key holding of
Anglo-Swiss giant Xstrata PLC. Raglan
produces about 1.3 million tonnes of nickel
annually, making it a large-scale nickel
operation. But that’s still less than 10 per
cent of the product that will hauled out of
Mary River every year.
Residents in places like Pond Inlet, 170 km
from the proposed mine, are wrestling with
the project. “This project is large, very
large,” said Colin Saunders, the town's
economic development officer. “The amount of
jobs and opportunities that will be
available to the High Arctic residents are
going to be significant, very significant.
“But there's a trade-off and you have to
balance the jobs and the contracts with the
environmental impacts.”
The evolution of a mine
Just about everyone in the mining world has
known about the iron ore at Mary River for
decades. Mining it has been a dream ever
since Murray Watts, a legendary Canadian
prospector, climbed into a beat-up Cessna in
July, 1962, to scout around the northern
part of Baffin Island.
No one took the trip seriously at the time;
mining industry players figured that finding
anything in the barren setting was hopeless.
But Mr. Watts had long believed in the
riches of the north and he had been
exploring the northeastern Arctic for 30
years. After a few more trips that summer,
Mr. Watts found four iron ore deposits south
of Pond Inlet. The site was named Mary River
by Europeans, but it had been a meeting
place for Inuit hunters for centuries.
The richness of the deposit astounded even
Mr. Watts. The iron content ranged from 65
to 70 per cent. That’s so pure that the ore
can be picked up, dusted off and tossed into
a blast furnace. And yet, despite the
attractiveness of the find, no company had
the financial wherewithal to mine it.
Mr. Watts died in a car crash in 1982, and
four years later, the site ended up in the
hands of Baffinland Iron Mines Corp., a
small Toronto-based company. But development
costs were just too high and the project was
shelved. Interest was reignited in 2004,
when Baffinland went public and raised
enough money to cover some testing and
surveying at the site. The results confirmed
the remarkable quality of the find and that
it was the one of the largest undeveloped
iron ore deposits in the world. By 2007, the
company had calculated that a mine would
cost more than $4-billion, far beyond the
ability of a small player like Baffinland to
raise, especially with a global credit
crunch starting to unfold.
By the middle of last year, financial
markets had recovered and the price of iron
ore was climbing to record levels. Suddenly
Mary River was in hot demand and Baffinland
was the target of a global bidding war that
pitted a U.S. private equity fund against
Luxembourg-based ArcelorMittal SA, the
world’s largest steel maker. After battling
for months, and jacking their bids from 80
cents a share to $1.50, the two sides called
a truce and made a joint offer last January
worth more than $500-million. The takeover
closed in March.
Now, with ArcelorMittal’s backing,
Baffinland was finally ready to forge ahead
with its dream mine at Mary River, at a
price tag of $4.1-billion.
There was never any doubt the project would
be expensive and gigantic. But material
filed at the Nunavut Impact Review Board –
10 volumes of documents spanning more than
5,000 pages – offer a unique perspective on
just how complex it is.
The rail line is the trickiest part. It will
cost nearly $2-billion, or up to $13-million
per kilometre, and take four years to build.
Construction will require more than 1,000
workers, divided into four teams camped out
along the route. The track will run from the
mine site to a new port at Steensby Inlet,
along the western side of central Baffin
Island. Mapping the route took years because
of the difficult terrain; the rail line will
require 31 bridges and two tunnels,
including one measuring 1.3 kilometres.
Building all that would be hard enough
anywhere, but the constant cold in the
Arctic means many sections of the line,
including the bridges, will have to be
pre-assembled and then shipped in. But even
with global warming, regular transport ships
still have to travel mainly in summer,
making logistics a potential nightmare. “You
only get one chance a year to get material
up there,” said Ron Hampton, the project
director. “It forces you to be very
efficient at your planning.”
Permafrost poses another challenge. Baffin
Island is covered with continuous permafrost
about 400 metres deep. But the surface
layer, about three metres thick, is subject
to seasonal freezing and thawing. The train
track will be set on an embankment measuring
up to four metres in height and made from
crushed rock to provide stability over the
fragile ground. Supports for bridges will be
driven into the bedrock to ensure they keep
stable if climate change alters the surface.
Once the track is built, the railway will be
in constant use. Along with hauling iron
ore, the line will provide a passenger
service for employees and transport supplies
to the mine site. Each train will be at
least 110 cars long and rumble down the
track at up to 75 kilometres per hour. The
total rail fleet will include 367 rail cars
and 11 locomotives, especially made to
withstand the cold.
The port at Steensby Inlet will handle
year-round voyages back and forth to Europe,
with one ship moving through the icy waters
every 32 hours. The company’s shipping fleet
will include 10 ice-breaking cargo vessels,
some measuring 329 metres in length and
having five times the carrying capacity as
ships used at the Raglan mine. Most are
expected to head to Rotterdam, a round-trip
voyage that will take up to 45 days in
winter.
A cultural divide
Baffinland officials have taken the proposal
to communities across the region for months,
with several more meetings slated in coming
weeks. It hasn’t been easy. Barely 5,400
people live within 400 kilometres of the
mine, and their lifestyle is different even
from other parts of Nunavut. Roughly 41 per
cent of the population is under the age of
15 and 40 per cent of families earn less
than $10,000 annually. Many people live off
the land, hunting herds of caribou that roam
directly across the route of the railway.
Some meetings attracted just five people,
many of whom spoke only Inuktitut. But
passions ran high and opinions were sharply
divided about the project. The regulatory
filing includes nearly 700 pages of comments
from residents and minutes from several
community meetings.
“Our ancestors brought us here through their
survival on country food, with no white
man,” one man said. “I might behave like a
white man, but it is my father’s words I use
when I go hunting. I don’t know computers
and can’t speak English, but I am passionate
about our knowledge.”
“Thank you for trying to help us get more
jobs, but the Inuit and white are
different,” another man said. “They should
be treated equally. When white man is trying
to be on top, they don’t like Inuit. Don’t
come here then, if you don’t like Inuit.”
Officials at Baffinland insist the project
will respect the local culture and protect
wildlife. They point to other northern
mining projects that have not disrupted
caribou and provided badly needed
opportunity. The Mary River project “has the
potential to provide significant benefits to
the north and we’re just working through a
process now that we need to get through and
reach a point where we can develop it,” said
Greg Missal, Baffinland’s vice-president of
corporate affairs. If all goes well, he
added, construction could start in early
2013.
But convincing people like George Qallaut,
who lives in Igloolik which is across from
the Steensby Inlet, won’t be easy. During
one public meeting, Mr. Qallaut stood up and
spoke about the 4,000-year history of the
area, and about the dramatic changes in
landscape the project will cause.
“The people of Igloolik and Pond Inlet have
for centuries met at Mary River during the
summer hunting caribou,” he told the group.
“An elder present at this meeting got his
first caribou at Mary River. Two mountains
will be gone in 25 years. Part of their
identity will disappear. How can you
compensate for this?”

.jpg)

